<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Hosting Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-balloon-two.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-balloon-two.com</link>
	<description>Google Free Web Hosting and Top Free Web Hosting Sites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:26:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Uk Web Hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.red-balloon-two.com/uk-web-hosting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.red-balloon-two.com/uk-web-hosting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 08:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-balloon-two.com/uk-web-hosting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[uk web hosting Available Right Now on Amazon for uk web hosting Available Right Now on eBay for uk web hosting All are Free Shipping and "Buy Now" Prices Please select your country from the drop down box US Auctions Australian Auctions Austrian Auctions Belgian Auctions Canadian Auctions French Auctions German Auctions Indian Auctions Irish &#8230; </p><p><a class="more-link block-button" href="http://www.red-balloon-two.com/uk-web-hosting/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.red-balloon-two.com/uk-web-hosting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	<item>
		<title>Santorum Optimistic Despite Recent Losses</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/santorum-optimistic-despite-recent-losses/?mod=WSJBlog</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/santorum-optimistic-despite-recent-losses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Trottman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/?p=33463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick Santorum will not be deterred by his string of losses in recent GOP caucuses. “I think we’re going to do very well in Minnesota , Colorado” and Missouri, where, he noted, he’ll go head to head with  front-runner former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Santorum will not be deterred by his string of losses in recent GOP caucuses.</p>
<p>“I think we’re going to do very well in Minnesota , Colorado” and Missouri, where, he noted, he’ll go head to head with  front-runner former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.</p>
<p>“The first five states are kind of cast and stone,” the former Pennsylvania Senator said during an appearance on Fox News Sunday. “I think you wait for Tuesday” when Colorado will hold its Republican caucus and Missouri will have its primary,  he said.</p>
<p>Why the optimism?</p>
<p>So far the primaries have occurred in states where Mr. Romney and Rep. Ron Paul of Texas had head starts, Mr. Santorum said.</p>
<p>Now, the races are moving into states where he believes they “don’t have the natural advantage.”</p>
<p>He’s also encouraged by polls that have suggested he’s the likeliest candidate to beat President Barack Obama in November. A recent Rasmussen poll shows 48% of likely voters supporting Mr. Obama, and 38% supporting Mr. Santorum. Nine percent preferred some other candidate and five remained undecided.</p>
<p>“It’s not about the primary, it’s about who can win the election,” Mr. Santorum said.</p>
<p>Mr. Santorum has taken shots at both of his main competitors, saying they don’t represent a good contrast to President Barack Obama. In ads, he has criticized Mr. Gingrich for not being a “true conservative” and suggested Mr. Gingrich’s personal life has fallen short of upholding family values.  He has said Mr. Romney will become less appealing of a candidate if the economy improves. When asked Sunday to explain why, Mr. Santorum said: “All he talks about is being the CEO, being the business man.”</p>
<p>Mr. Santorum’s outlook doesn’t change the fact that Mr. Romney has had double-digit victories in Florida, and then Nevada Saturday, making his front-runner status more solid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/santorum-optimistic-despite-recent-losses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patriots or Giants? Obama&#8217;s Not Saying</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/patriots-or-giants-obamas-not-saying/?mod=WSJBlog</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/patriots-or-giants-obamas-not-saying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol E. Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superbowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/?p=33462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama not only declined to host one of his famous bipartisan Super Bowl parties at the White House this year, he's also taking an election-year stance of not picking sides in the Giants-Patriots matchup.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama not only declined to host one of his famous bipartisan Super Bowl parties at the White House this year, he&#8217;s also taking an election-year stance of not picking sides in the Giants-Patriots matchup.</p>
<p>“I think this is going to be a tough game,” Mr. Obama said in a pre-game interview with NBC’s Matt Lauer. Pressed on who he’s rooting for, Mr. Obama told Mr. Lauer with a smile, “You’re not going to get me.”</p>
<p>The president, a Chicago Bears fan who unabashedly rooted for the Pittsburgh Steelers in the 2009 Super Bowl, instead offered a diplomatic take on the championship game.</p>
<p>Mr. Obama said the New York Giants and New England Patriots – both from solidly blue parts of the country – each “have their weaknesses.” He praised the Giants’ comeback this year as “pretty remarkable,” and the Patriots, he said, are “always tough” even though their defense is a “little shaky.”</p>
<p>Mr. Obama plans to watch the game with his wife and daughters at the White House.</p>
<p>His full interview with Mr. Lauer is set to air Monday morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/patriots-or-giants-obamas-not-saying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: U.S. Will &#8216;Do Everything We Can&#8217; to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/obama-u-s-will-do-everything-we-can-to-stop-iran-from-getting-a-nuclear-weapon/?mod=WSJBlog</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/obama-u-s-will-do-everything-we-can-to-stop-iran-from-getting-a-nuclear-weapon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol E. Lee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/?p=33461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama on Sunday wouldn't rule out U.S. support for an Israeli military strike against Iran, but said his administration still prefers a diplomatic solution to ease tensions over Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama on Sunday wouldn&#8217;t rule out U.S. support for an Israeli military strike against Iran, but said his administration still prefers a diplomatic solution to ease tensions over Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.</p>
<p>Mr. Obama, in an interview with NBC that aired Sunday evening, said his administration will “do everything we can” to keep Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, while warning that military action would have an adverse impact on U.S. economic and security interests.</p>
<p>“I don’t think that Israel has made a decision on what they need to do. I think they, like us, believe that Iran has to stand down on its nuclear weapons program,” Mr. Obama said.</p>
<p>“Our goal is to resolve this issue diplomatically, that would be preferable,” Mr. Obama said. “We’re not going to take any options off the table though. Obviously any kind of additional military activity inside the Gulf is disruptive and has a big effect on us. It could have a big effect on oil prices.”</p>
<p>Mr. Obama’s comments come as U.S. defense officials are growing increasingly concerned that Israel will launch military strikes against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.</p>
<p>The president declined to discuss details of his administration’s discussions with the Israelis, but said the two countries have been engaged in “closer military and intelligence consultation” than ever before.</p>
<p>“My No. 1 priority continues to be the security of the United States, but also the security of Israel, and we are going to make sure that we work in lock step as we proceed to try to solve this, hopefully diplomatically,” he said.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, he said Tehran is “feeling the pinch” of economic sanctions by the U.S. and others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/obama-u-s-will-do-everything-we-can-to-stop-iran-from-getting-a-nuclear-weapon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney Scores Across the Board in Nevada</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/romney-scores-across-the-board-in-nevada/?mod=WSJBlog</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/romney-scores-across-the-board-in-nevada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Janet Hook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/?p=33460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney’s commanding victory in Nevada was built squarely on a foundation of substantial Mormon support as well as on winning the most-conservative blocs that in other states are his rival Newt Gingrich’s strongest constituencies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney’s commanding victory in Nevada was built squarely on a foundation of substantial Mormon support as well as on winning the most-conservative blocs that in other states are his rival Newt Gingrich’s strongest constituencies.</p>
<p>According to polls conducted across the state of voters as they entered the Nevada caucuses, a quarter of voters were Mormon &#8212; and 88% of them voted for the former Massachusetts governor. But perhaps more surprising was the fact that Mr. Romney won 46% of voters who described themselves as &#8220;very conservative,&#8221; a sizable advantage over the 25% who backed Mr. Gingrich.</p>
<p>Even strong supporters of the tea party gave Mr. Romney the edge, 35% to Mr. Gingrich’s 32%. Evangelical Christians favored him over Mr. Gingrich 43% to 28%.</p>
<p>The polls identified only a few weak spots in Mr. Romney’s across-the-board victory. Amid complaints from his critics that he cares too little about the poor, voters earning less than $30,000 a year favored Mr. Gingrich over Mr. Romney 32% to 29%. Independent voters in Nevada, as in other states where non-Republicans are allowed to participate, favored Texas Rep. Ron Paul with 46%; Mr. Romney got 28% of their vote, Mr. Gingrich 17%.</p>
<p>Another group that gave Mr. Romney a big thumbs down were the 18% of voters who said the most important quality they were looking for was that the candidate be a &#8220;true conservative&#8221; &#8212; only 4% of them supported Mr. Romney.</p>
<p>But far more voters, 43%, said their priority was to nominate a candidate who would beat President Barack Obama. Of those voters, 70% backed Mr. Romney.</p>
<object id="wsj_fp" width="512" height="363">
                <param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/VideoPlayerMain.swf"></param>
                <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
                <param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
                <param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID={D03F3E24-8F98-4B3B-9B45-C7A5A640AADC}&playerid=1000&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="flashPlayer"></param>
                    <embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/VideoPlayerMain.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" allowscriptaccess="always" flashVars="videoGUID={D03F3E24-8F98-4B3B-9B45-C7A5A640AADC}&playerid=1000&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="flashPlayer" width="512" height="363" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed>
            </object>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/romney-scores-across-the-board-in-nevada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Decries Poor Turnout in Nevada, Florida</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/paul-decries-poor-turnout-in-nevada-florida/?mod=WSJBlog</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/paul-decries-poor-turnout-in-nevada-florida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Morath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/?p=33459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Low turnout in Nevada and Florida shows that voters are unhappy with their choices, said Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul, who has yet to win a contest this year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Low turnout in Nevada and Florida shows that voters are unhappy with their choices, said Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul, who has yet to win a contest this year.</p>
<p>“There&#8217;s a lot of people not satisfied with any of the candidates out there,” the Texas congressman said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week with<strong> </strong>George Stephanopoulos.&#8221; “And that&#8217;s why in many ways we&#8217;re seeing a lower turnout right now.”</p>
<p>Fewer voters came out in Nevada and Florida than four years ago, when Mr. Paul attempted to challenge eventual nominee John McCain and this year’s front-runner Mitt Romney.</p>
<p>Mr. Paul said Republicans are wondering why they haven’t been offered someone else besides Mr. Romney and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.</p>
<p>“That’s what I’m trying to change,” Mr. Paul said on ABC.</p>
<p>The congressman said he plans to continue the race. He was campaigning in Minnesota on Saturday even as votes were tallied in Nevada.</p>
<p>“We have three or four caucus states that we believe our numbers are doing pretty good, so we have to just wait and see and continue to do exactly what we&#8217;re doing,” he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/paul-decries-poor-turnout-in-nevada-florida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gingrich Looks Ahead to Super Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/gingrich-looks-ahead-to-super-tuesday/?mod=WSJBlog</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/gingrich-looks-ahead-to-super-tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Morath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/?p=33458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich said the road ahead looks promising despite his decisive losses in Nevada and Florida.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich on Sunday said the road ahead looks promising despite his decisive losses in Nevada and Florida.</p>
<p>“Our goal is to get to Super Tuesday where we’re in much more favorable territory,” Mr. Gingrich said on NBC’s &#8220;Meet the Press,&#8221; pointing to primary voting in several southern states in early March.</p>
<p>After Texas’ primary in early April, “we’ll be very, very competitive in delegate count,” the former house speaker said.</p>
<p>On CBS&#8217;s &#8220;Face the Nation&#8221; Sunday, Mr. Gingrich answered questions about how he will adequately campaign in the next few weeks, a period during which there won&#8217;t be any Republican debates to help him reach a broad audience.</p>
<p>He agreed he lacks the organization and money of better-funded Mitt Romney, but said &#8220;we do have a lot of popular support and a pretty big grass-roots movement in every state,&#8221; he said. That, along with his &#8220;bold&#8221; plans to address taxes, social security for young people and welfare in states, should be a good foundation to &#8220;focus on the very big differences&#8221; between him and Mr. Romney, he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;My goal will be to show there’s a way to change Washington to get us on the right track that’s different from Obama and Romney,&#8221; he said, criticizing Mr. Romney&#8217;s job creation record as Massachusetts governor and his recent comment that he&#8217;s not concerned about the poor because they have safety nets.</p>
<p>Mr. Gingrich said the existing safety net is a “spider web” that traps the poor at the bottom.</p>
<p>Republicans will lose in the fall if they nominate a more moderate candidate like Mr. Romney, he said, citing Arizona Sen. John McCain’s loss to President Barack Obama is 2008.</p>
<p>Mr. Romney&#8217;s supporters say he is the best choice in November.</p>
<p>Mr. Romney is “winning every segment of the Republican base,” Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, a Republican, said Sunday on CNN’s &#8220;State of the Union.&#8221; “He’s got the best chance to beat President Obama.”</p>
<object id="wsj_fp" width="512" height="363">
                <param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/VideoPlayerMain.swf"></param>
                <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
                <param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
                <param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID={FC0BEC1B-03B1-4D56-8C0E-431FBF188B75}&playerid=1000&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="flashPlayer"></param>
                    <embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/VideoPlayerMain.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" allowscriptaccess="always" flashVars="videoGUID={FC0BEC1B-03B1-4D56-8C0E-431FBF188B75}&playerid=1000&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="flashPlayer" width="512" height="363" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed>
            </object>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/gingrich-looks-ahead-to-super-tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives Cautious in Embracing Romney</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/conservatives-cautious-in-embracing-romney/?mod=WSJBlog</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/conservatives-cautious-in-embracing-romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Morath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Perkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/?p=33455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evangelical Christians and tea-party supporters, key members of the Republican base, will continue take their time in warming up to GOP front-runner Mitt Romney, a key conservative leader said.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evangelical Christians and tea-party supporters, key members of the Republican base, will continue take their time in warming up to GOP front-runner Mitt Romney, a key conservative leader said on Sunday.</p>
<p>“There is not going to be that enthusiasm among the base” for Mr. Romney, said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, a conservative Christian organization.</p>
<p>“The focus now is on the House and the Senate and expanding conservative majorities” in Congress, he said Sunday on CNN’s &#8220;State of the Union,&#8221; suggesting some conservatives are growing weary of the presidential primary fight and turning their attention to congressional races.</p>
<p>Mr. Perkins headed a meeting of social conservative leaders in Texas last month that backed Rick Santorum’s campaign. But after a strong showing in Iowa, Mr. Santorum has struggled. He finished a disappointing fourth in Saturday’s Nevada caucuses.</p>
<p>Mr. Perkins said Mr. Romney was preferable to President Barack Obama, but added that it could take until the Republican convention to see support for Mr. Romney solidify among social conservatives.</p>
<p>Former Republican House Majority Leader Dick Armey also showed tepid support for Mr. Romney, but conceded that the ex-Massachusetts governor appears likely to take the nomination.</p>
<p>“We’re not going to get a reliable, small-government conservative out of this nominating process,” Mr. Armey said on CNN. Mr. Armey is chairman of FreedomWorks, an organization that has aligned itself with tea-party supporters.</p>
<p>Mr. Armey said he doesn’t see former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who appears to be fading, building fresh momentum as the Republican primary race continues.</p>
<p>Mr. Gingrich is “taking a second-rate campaign and turning it into a first-rate vendetta,” said Mr. Armey, who was a Republican leader alongside Mr. Gingrich in the 1990s. “I don’ t think Newt will be able to replicate that magic moment he had in South Carolina.”</p>
<object id="wsj_fp" width="512" height="363">
                <param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/VideoPlayerMain.swf"></param>
                <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
                <param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
                <param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID={7598D8CA-86ED-4486-B3E7-C18E7EB1943F}&playerid=1000&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="flashPlayer"></param>
                    <embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/VideoPlayerMain.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" allowscriptaccess="always" flashVars="videoGUID={7598D8CA-86ED-4486-B3E7-C18E7EB1943F}&playerid=1000&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="flashPlayer" width="512" height="363" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed>
            </object>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/05/conservatives-cautious-in-embracing-romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul: Focus On Delegates, Not ‘Must-Win’ States</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/04/ron-paul-focus-on-delegates-not-must-win-states/?mod=WSJBlog</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/04/ron-paul-focus-on-delegates-not-must-win-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crittenden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/?p=33454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ARDEN HILLS, Minn.-- Rep. Ron Paul said Saturday evening that he did not consider any states “must-win” for his campaign, though he acknowledged the need to continue to win delegates.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ARDEN HILLS, Minn.&#8211; Rep. Ron Paul said Saturday evening that he did not consider any states “must-win” for his campaign, though he acknowledged the need to continue to win delegates.</p>
<p>Mr. Paul, speaking to reporters following a rally before an estimated 1,500 at Bethel University, said there was “no doubt” that his campaign has gained more traction than in 2008. While he would need to win outright some states to achieve the nomination, Mr. Paul said he is more focused on picking off delegates for the Republican National Convention.</p>
<p>“I want to maximize delegates, and so far we’ve been able to pick up delegates,” Mr. Paul said following the third of three overflow events in Minnesota, which holds its caucus votes on Tuesday evening.</p>
<p>A test for Mr. Paul’s campaign came earlier on Saturday, when Nevada Republicans caucused in a state where the Texas Republican came second in 2008. Mr. Paul said preliminary reports from Nevada suggested another second place finish, though he acknowledged former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney was out of reach.</p>
<p>“We are planning on getting some delegates out of Nevada, the number is uncertain yet and later tonight we’ll know,” he said.</p>
<p>Mr. Paul weighed in on a range of issues during his stump speech, which was well received by a crowd that was noticeably younger than at some of his other events. The long-time critic of the Federal Reserve lambasted the central bank and chairman Ben Bernanke, suggesting Mr. Bernanke “literally laughs” at people who suggest record-low interest rates are hurting consumers who seek to build their savings.</p>
<p>Additionally, he said the Fed and the U.S. routinely mislead the public.</p>
<p>“They lie and fib to us, they say there’s no inflation. Nobody believes it’s only 2% inflation; if it even is 2%, who has the right to steal 2% of your money every year?” Mr. Paul told the crowd.</p>
<p>He added, “The unemployment figures and the inflation figures are all deception.”</p>
<p>Mr. Paul also suggested he agreed with the decision by China and Russia to veto a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning violence in Syria. Violence in Syria, which has grown in recent days, is a “neighborhood problem,” Mr. Paul said, suggesting it would not be appropriate for the United Nations to engage in the region.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/04/ron-paul-focus-on-delegates-not-must-win-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney Credits Business Owners &#8212; Not Obama &#8212; for Improving Economy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/04/romney-credits-business-owners-not-obama-for-improving-economy/?mod=WSJBlog</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/04/romney-credits-business-owners-not-obama-for-improving-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sara Murray</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/?p=33453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney, who has been selling himself as the presidential candidate best qualified to turn around the economy, acknowledged Saturday that things are improving – and then proceeded to tear into President Barack Obama's economic policies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>COLORADO SPRINGS—<strong>Mitt Romney</strong>, who has been selling himself as the presidential candidate best qualified to turn around the economy, acknowledged Saturday that things are improving – and then proceeded to tear into President <strong>Barack Obama</strong>&#8216;s economic policies.</p>
<div class="mceTemp" style="text-align: left">
<dl class="wp-caption alignright caption-alignright " style="width: 262px"> 
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img class="size-full wp-image-5" src="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-RR167_Romney_D_20120204184804.jpg" alt="" width="262" height="174" /></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd" style="text-align: left">Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign rally in Colorado Springs, Colo., Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p>“I’m delighted things are getting better. I think they are,” Mr. Romney told a crowd packed into a metal fabrication plant here. But instead of giving any recognition to Mr. Obama, he said the credit belonged to businessmen like the owner of the plant.</p>
<p>Amid signs of economic improvement, Mr. Romney is offering a broader buffet of options for attacking the president’s fiscal policies. On Saturday, he laid into Mr. Obama for his “crony capitalism,” dubbed the stimulus package a failure and warned that Washington’s borrowing was putting the nation on an unsustainable path.</p>
<p>“That stimulus he had, it did not do the job,” Mr. Romney said. “That stimulus did not create private sector jobs like it should have, like it could have. It instead protected government jobs.”</p>
<p>Mr. Romney, who is heavily favored to win Saturday&#8217;s Nevada caucuses, also treated the western state to a fuller description of his time spent working for the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, an experience he often cites among his business successes.</p>
<p>“We were draped in scandal, I’ll tell ya, it was a real mess,” Mr. Romney said as he explained they needed to recruit some 25,000 volunteers for the games to run smoothly.</p>
<p>“As a volunteer you got no tickets to any events, alright, all you got was the uniform, you know the jacket and the leggings and so forth,” Mr. Romney said. “Seventeen days working in a parking lot directing traffic or on the side of a mountain, you know, smoothing down the snow for the skiers that would come along. That’s what you did.”</p>
<p>Mr. Romney said some 47,000 volunteers ultimately applied and chalked it up to Americans stepping up in a time of need.</p>
<p>With such little presence out West from <strong>Newt Gingrich</strong>, Mr. Romney has been silent on his chief GOP rival in recent days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/04/romney-credits-business-owners-not-obama-for-improving-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
	<media:group><media:content url="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-RR167_Romney_A_20120204184804.jpg" type="image/jpg" medium="image" /><media:content url="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-RR167_Romney_C_20120204184804.jpg" type="image/jpg" medium="image" /><media:content url="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-RR167_Romney_D_20120204184804.jpg" type="image/jpg" medium="image" /><media:content url="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-RR167_Romney_E_20120204184804.jpg" type="image/jpg" medium="image" /><media:content url="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-RR167_Romney_F_20120204184804.jpg" type="image/jpg" medium="image" /><media:content url="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-RR167_Romney_G_20120204184804.jpg" type="image/jpg" medium="image" /></media:group>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Paul: Repeal Patriot Act, NDAA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/04/rep-paul-repeal-patriot-act-ndaa/?mod=WSJBlog</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/04/rep-paul-repeal-patriot-act-ndaa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crittenden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriot Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/?p=33452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Ron Paul is attracting strong support at a series of rallies in Minnesota Saturday, and few lines of his stump speech are receiving more cheers than his call to repeal the Patriot Act and National Defense Authorization Act.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By Michael R. Crittenden</em></p>
<p>CHANHASSEN, Minn.&#8211;GOP presidential hopeful Rep. <strong>Ron Paul</strong> is attracting strong support  at  a series of rallies in Minnesota Saturday, and few lines of his  stump  speech are receiving more cheers than his call to repeal the  Patriot  Act and National Defense Authorization Act.</p>
<div class="mceTemp" style="text-align: left">
<dl class="wp-caption alignleft caption-alignleft " style="width: 262px"> 
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img class="size-full wp-image-5" src="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-RR165_RonPau_D_20120204165419.jpg" alt="" width="262" height="174" /></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd" style="text-align: left">A giant bull with a sign supporting Ron Paul sits outside a rally in Chanhassen, Minn., Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012. (WSJ Photo by Michael R. Crittenden)</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p>Mr. Paul, rallying voters ahead of Tuesday’s Minnesota caucuses, told supporters at an afternoon rally that these laws -– particularly the NDAA -– “is not what this country is about!” The sentiment, as it was in campaign stops earlier this week in Nevada, was met with hearty cheers from Mr. Paul’s backers, many of whom were turned away or forced to listen from outside the venue on a brisk winter afternoon.</p>
<p>With a libertarian platform focused on reducing the influence of the federal government and boosting individual rights, Mr. Paul is a natural adversary for the more invasive provisions in the Patriot Act and NDAA. The latter especially is a frequently yelled slogan at Mr. Paul’s event, typically with a derisive sneer or as a rallying cry for supporters.</p>
<p>The NDAA, signed by President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> on New Year’s Eve, includes a provision giving the government the power to indefinitely detain any terror suspect captured on U.S. or foreign soil, even if that person is a U.S. citizen.</p>
<p>“The president can use the military to arrest American citizens, they don’t have to be charged, they don’t have to be tried,” Mr. Paul explained to a standing-room-only crowd in Rochester, Minn., earlier on Saturday. “If that stands there’s not much left to our American civil liberties … if we can watch that and not do something about it the future looks bleak.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/02/04/rep-paul-repeal-patriot-act-ndaa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 2.038 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-06 11:37:12 -->

